these platforms are attractive because of their practical advantages in everyday life. Platforms often generate positive opinions because they are seen as allowing people to create or maintain social connections and fulfill practical functions in everyday life. The respondents' trust varies depending on the topics covered. Political articles have by far raised the most concern. The distrust of politicians, widespread among this segment of the population, has often extended to the media relaying their words, even for information purposes.
Others accuse the media of inconsistency, perceiving greece whatsapp number data 5 million inconsistencies in the information linked to the media's supposed complacency with power. In practice, respondents often make quick judgments about the reliability of the information they see. They rely on the limited information they have, using mental shortcuts. Many respondents referred to the importance of their " intuition " when it came to determining the reliability of information and rejected news media that they considered biased, manipulative or even corrupt.
"In the past, the television media did what they [the politicians] wanted. They still do. They are no longer credible." – Glauber Judging what is trustworthy. the main shortcuts used to make sense of information on platforms To sift through the vast volumes of information encountered on platforms, individuals develop processing strategies that lead to conclusions they would not have drawn if they had been more attentive.