No smartphones during the meeting
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 4:45 am
A final note: I am very curious about your feedback on my model. Because I want to apply the model to the development of the model itself. Meta, huh? So, self-knowledge: I need your feedback to have a better insight into my added value (and specifically of this model), strengths and weaknesses. Self-management: I then determine myself whether and if so what I do with your feedback, and how exactly I further develop the model. Self-actualization: that ensures that I come closer to realizing my maximum potential. For you and with you.
And that process continues. Thanks to continuous feedback loops, between me and the outside world. Continuously, that is. And together.
o you ever look at your phone during a meeting? Maybe at the point where your colleague brings up a 'nice idea' after an hour of talking? It probably won't be appreciated. Can't you listen seriously for a while instead of texting or checking your timeline? On the other hand: why is the meeting taking so long? Why wasn't the idea thought out better? Can't the chairperson cut it short?
I can understand both perspectives.
Perhaps you see a ban as a solution:
'Do not introduce ideas that are not on the agenda.'
I advocate taking a slightly more flexible approach.
effective meetings with social media
Such a long meeting is nice.
How can you use smartphones and social media israel telegram data to make your meeting more effective instead of more frustrating? Take into account how your colleague likes to communicate. But first, a bit of background. From your own experience, you probably know that people communicate very differently.
Some people like to have a good sparring session or even a heated discussion, while others prefer to think for a while before speaking.
Also, one person prefers to use the app, while another prefers to call or just meet. You can attribute these differences to generation, but just as well to character or profession. In any case, there is a big chance that they exist.
Casting
By nature, face-to-face discussants have the upper hand during a meeting. They often take the floor, which does not always benefit the quality. That is why they learn in traditional meeting training to listen better and, where necessary, to prepare more thoroughly.
And that process continues. Thanks to continuous feedback loops, between me and the outside world. Continuously, that is. And together.
o you ever look at your phone during a meeting? Maybe at the point where your colleague brings up a 'nice idea' after an hour of talking? It probably won't be appreciated. Can't you listen seriously for a while instead of texting or checking your timeline? On the other hand: why is the meeting taking so long? Why wasn't the idea thought out better? Can't the chairperson cut it short?
I can understand both perspectives.
Perhaps you see a ban as a solution:
'Do not introduce ideas that are not on the agenda.'
I advocate taking a slightly more flexible approach.
effective meetings with social media
Such a long meeting is nice.
How can you use smartphones and social media israel telegram data to make your meeting more effective instead of more frustrating? Take into account how your colleague likes to communicate. But first, a bit of background. From your own experience, you probably know that people communicate very differently.
Some people like to have a good sparring session or even a heated discussion, while others prefer to think for a while before speaking.
Also, one person prefers to use the app, while another prefers to call or just meet. You can attribute these differences to generation, but just as well to character or profession. In any case, there is a big chance that they exist.
Casting
By nature, face-to-face discussants have the upper hand during a meeting. They often take the floor, which does not always benefit the quality. That is why they learn in traditional meeting training to listen better and, where necessary, to prepare more thoroughly.