As a pragmatic approach to minimizing the possibility of performance-relevant risks occurring, it is recommended that the team maintain and use a form of documentation that explicitly addresses these risks.
Unfortunately, the term documentation often has negative connotations and is seen as a hindrance. And especially in the context of agile frameworks and methods, the topic of documentation is often postponed, as a mostly misunderstood principle of agile methods puts functioning software above comprehensive documentation. However, it is about transferring the possible risks into armenia telegram screening a living risk management system. The purpose is to keep performance and scalability at the highest possible level. The measures of the risk management system correspond to both technical measures in the actual software development and the documentation of the expected behavior of the application under load, the so-called workload.
Documentation should not be confused with a blank screen. As seen in the previous section, there are a number of generic challenges in the design of SQL Server tables and the development of T-SQL statements and procedures. Each of these points represents a potential risk, which is converted into a checklist. This checklist is used every time database-relevant parts of the application are adapted or extended in order to systematically check and thus document that the possibility of later performance problems has been reduced.