One is due to the growing difficulties raised by emission reduction targets set based solely on the scope of what is called the "territorial inventory". This is the one retained by the Kyoto Protocol but also the European Green Deal. However, by focusing only on our domestic emissions, we could be pleased to see industrial relocations continue. This can lead to aberrations. In fact, we must, as quickly as possible, adopt double accounting, by integrating the emissions caused by our imports through a complete reasoning in terms of product life cycle and carbon footprint. Taking into account scope 3 (supplies) in the russia phone number list greenhouse gas balances of organizations will require a change of perspective.
The other lesson comes from the first. It is that of the close link that is established between ecological planning, in particular energy-climate, and imperative efforts of reindustrialization. By pressing the accelerator to decarbonize, we are widening our trade deficits at lightning speed. In low-carbon mobility, heat pumps, the production of renewable electrical energy, etc.,
our trade deficits have gone from around €5 billion in 2919 to €18 billion in 2023 according to an ADEME study. Public aid massively subsidizes our imports. It seems to me very urgent to reverse the trend and make transitions a powerful lever for the productive revitalization of territories.