The strategies developed from here can either help or hinder the progress of a proposal. By influencing the path that the matter should take, it is possible to facilitate a faster or slower analysis of a subject. And this will depend on how the institutional and government relations (IGR) professional has prepared themselves to act in relation to these stakeholders.
Other opportunities then arise. In committees, it is possible to work on including or removing items from the agenda, designating a rapporteur, making suggestions to the text of the opinion and obstructing the issue. Furthermore, if there is a broader agreement, there are resources available so that a project can be waived by committee analysis and voted on directly in the plenary, facilitating quick approval.
All of these alternatives, which serve different purposes, are based czech republic mobile database on technical dialogue between those who defend interests and political decision-makers such as state and federal deputies and senators.
Comparatively few bills reach the plenary session of the Chamber of Deputies. However, most matters that affect the political sphere are analyzed by the highest body of the House. There, the possibilities for lobbyists to influence are not exhausted.
The first challenge is to include the proposal on the agenda, a factor that depends largely on the mobilization of interests from various political currents. Political mobilization is a powerful resource for the RIG professional to draw the attention of parliamentarians to the issue in question.
There are several data sources that the lobbyist can use at this point to build channels of dialogue and interaction with the groups he intends to engage . In other words, the better informed he is about the context, the better the chances of the lobbyist generating good results at this stage. Moving on to the analysis of the item, there is still the possibility of advancing or delaying the progress, with requests, amendments and highlights.