The testing showed that the worst-case scenario

Talk big database, solutions, and innovations for businesses.
Post Reply
mayaboti
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 3:48 am

The testing showed that the worst-case scenario

Post by mayaboti »

Both laboratory studies and full-scale test results showed that there is a 1/10 to 1% chance of damage to System 1 or System 2 exposure. A study of the safety and effectiveness of 95 GHz millimeter wave directed energy has been published in multiple professional journals and has been independently reviewed by a Human Effects Advisory Panel.” This system had a 0.1% chance of causing damage and did not penetrate more than 1/64th of an inch of skin.


This fact raises doubts that 5G can cause brain cancer shandong phone data or other types of cancer. Most 5G base stations are tens of thousands of times smaller than the ones the US government used in these tests. The idea that 5G mmWaves are dangerous for long-distance use is definitely exaggerated. In fact, if you look at the health risks of 5G, including mmWave and Sub-6GHz, they appear to be lower than the risks of current 3G and 4G networks.


The French National Frequency Agency (the French equivalent of the FCC) conducted tests to compare 4G with 5G. for 5G is slightly worse than the best-case scenario for 4G when it comes to radiation. The French are known for taking health issues seriously and wanting to see the facts. If France has this attitude, it's clear that 5G is not only safe, but it's also safer than 4G.
Post Reply