Independent service announcements

[mouakter13]

Since the repository only contains the code for some service and nothing else, you can have your own deployment cycle, independent of the progress of the applications that access it.

The service may use a fast release cycle, such as continuous delivery (where new code is deployed after passing all tests). Some libraries that access the service may use a slower release cycle, such as those that only produce a new version once a week.

Helps define access control across the organization
Only team members involved in developing a library need to add themselves to the corresponding repository and download its code. As a result, there is an implicit access control strategy for each layer of the application . Those involved with the library will have editing rights, and everyone else may not have access to the repository. Or they may be given read rights but not editing rights.

Allows teams to work autonomously
Team members can design the library architecture and implement its code working in isolation from all other teams. They can make decisions based on what the library does in the overall context without being affected by the specific requirements of any external team or application.

Problems with the Multir-Repo approach
Using multiple repositories can lead to several problems.

Libraries must constantly retune themselves
When a new version of a library is released that taiwan whatsapp number data contains breaking changes, libraries that depend on it will need to adapt to start using the latest version. If the library's release cycle is faster than that of its dependent libraries, they may quickly become out of sync with each other.

Teams will need to constantly update themselves to use the latest versions of other teams. Since different teams have different priorities, this can sometimes be difficult to achieve.

As a result, a team that is unable to catch up may end up sticking to the outdated version of the library it depends on. This outcome will have implications for the application (in terms of security, speed, and other considerations), and the development gap across libraries can only increase.

It can fragment teams
When different teams do not need to interact, they can work in their own silos. In the long term, this can lead to teams producing their own subcultures within the company, such as employing different programming or management methodologies or using different sets of development tools.