For several years now, Google has been using QUIC for its own services, including search, YouTube, and others, and has supported it in Chrome. For a while, Chrome was the only way to use QUIC when interacting with the Google services that support it. Mozilla recently added support for HTTP/3 in Firefox 72, but it's still experimental. The curl command-line tool also added support for HTTP/3 in version 7.66.0, as well as many additional features. On the server side, HTTP/3 is supported by LiteSpeed and Nginx.
Cloudflare and HTTP/3
On the cloud side, in addition to Google, Cloudflare announced a few months ago that it will temporarily enable HTTP/3 for some of its customers. Cloudflare is also the company behind Quiche, an open source Rust library for deploying HTTP/3 clients and servers.
As mentioned, HTTP/3 is still defined by the IETF and no official release date has been set yet. Meanwhile, HTTP/3 is growing globally, with almost 300,000 services worldwide using it. Google is still the top organization that introduces HTTP/3, but a few others have a small part. InfoQ will continue to communicate HTTP/3 in a timely manner to inform the public about the evolution of the Internet.There are numerous panels that are suitable for use on VPS or dedicated servers. They can be divided into paid and free. Among both groups, there are those models that are very popular among users. All of them, in fact, solve the same problem — they help with the automation of server settings, but each of them has its own characteristics. Some are perfect for supporting from one to two sites that require flexible settings, while others help in organizing mass hosting.
It happens that providers simply give paid control panels for VPS or dedicated servers. Moreover, such providers are common, and they give the most popular panels, like DirectAdmin. Much less often, providers offer to choose the control panel themselves.
Because of this, paid control panels are much more common than free ones, which are much less used due to their uselessness. In addition, free panels are much worse than their commercial models, which makes them much worse at their duties. Of course, they can also be used, but only the most experienced users will be able to use them normally. Therefore, it is better to choose the second option between free control panels and paid ones for the average webmaster, as it is much more convenient.
Free panels
First, you should deal with free models of control panels, and only then move on to paid ones.
VestaCP
This is one of the best free control panels. Thanks to the ability to use paid support, as well as the built-in installer, using this panel, you can open more than four hundred applications, including the CMS.
Thanks to the default LNAMP buy phone number list module, the panel has the ability to quickly handle static and dynamic content.
The panel supports numerous languages, including Russian.
Thanks to VestaCP, you can completely control the servers, getting all the information about them.
The panel supports the CLI interface.
Has the ability to install a mail server.
Has many databases.
Through the use of the web file manager, it becomes possible to copy, edit and view any file that is associated with the application.
Self-service certificate renewal.
Brainy
This panel is designed to manage corporate hosting. It contains numerous functions that are not inferior, and in some cases even surpass their paid counterparts. In addition, almost all processes on the server will be automated.
What options does this control panel provide:
Has a built-in application manager.
Automatically backs up files stored on the server.
Has a built-in file manager.
The control panel supports IPv6.
Has the ability to support remote DNS servers.