as many tend to reject information from “close people” they don’t like. Family and friends therefore represent trusted interlocutors , especially when they have particular expertise or are perceived as such, as one participant mentioned. “It’s pretty simple because most of the friends that I follow and whose opinions I trust, I let them filter that stuff for me. For example, Robert always knows what’s going on, I can trust his opinion.
It’s not necessarily that I like news articles” – Jerry Language georgia whatsapp number data 5 million and tone On social platforms, users only see very limited text. Less trusting users pay particular attention to the language and tone used in messages and posts. Thus, any form of sensationalism and clickbait puts users on their guard, which seems quite ironic given that they tend to consume information very briefly. One of the respondents, from Brazil, also specified that she had stopped consuming information from a Brazilian media outlet that used “overly sensationalist headlines .
” The attention to language and words also applies to the content of the articles. For those who clicked on the posts or messages, many reported paying close attention to the same characteristics, which they believed revealed biases or hidden agendas behind the media coverage. Any form of mismatch between the text itself and the expectations raised by the headline on social platforms was often experienced as a breach of trust.