We won’t allow AI-generated content on our platform and notify writers who use AI for content creation that their pieces will not be delivered to customers. For all these reasons, I am pretty confident that writers will use AI as a tool to increase their efficiency and productivity, not for creating content. writeraccess-free-trial Editing and Fact-Checking AI-generated writing highlights the need for editing and fact-checking. Some recent high-profile incidents confirm that with AI — as with human writers — editing and fact-checking need to be an essential part of the process.
Just to share one of the many examples, Men’s Journal italy email list recently published an article written using AI that had plenty of major errors in health content; errors that could have more serious consequences than those in a blog post by a tech startup. Originality and Plagiarism If we consider the formal definition of plagiarism, AI content generation tools do not copy and paste content. When someone uses an AI content creation tool to generate ideas or to write a blog post, the tool is using what it has learned from reading numerous pages to generate new content.
Google’s policies confirm that AI-created content is not considered plagiarism. Instead, it’s an original text based on the information available. AI pulls from multiple sources to create the content users search for. The legal risk is, of course, that authors could sue for plagiarism of their original work if the copy generated by AI is too closely related to the original.